Apple ‘working on NFC for iPhone 5′

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

Reports suggesting Apple is to bring near-field communications (NFC) functionality to its next iPhone have surfaced.

We are expecting the iPhone 5 to be announced later this year and according Mastercard and app developers, Apple is busy working on NFC technology.

9to5Mac claims to have spoken with the well-connected developer at Macworld who disclosed information received from Apple iOS engineers saying they are “heavily into NFC”.

The developer in question has not been named, but is working on a dedicated iOS app which includes NFC reading for mobile transactions. When questioned how confident he was on the information he had received his reply was “Enough to bet the app development on”.

The plot thickens

If Apple is working towards a NFC solution, a payment systems partner will be required and the Fast Company may have sourced the company in question.

In an interview with Ed McLaughlin, head of emerging payments at MasterCard, hints were dropped that Apple is working on NFC technology.

When asked to “estimate for when smartphone payments would become commonplace” McLaughlin replied “I don’t know of a handset manufacturer that isn’t in process of making sure their stuff is PayPass ready”.

When pushed to disclose whether the Cupertino based company was included, McLaughlin responded “like I say, [I don't know of] any handset maker out there [who are not in the process]“.

McLaughlin ensured he did not mention any brands (including Apple) during his interview, but you get the feeling that his answers we carefully formed so not to mention any company.

If these reports are to be believed, we are likely to see the iPhone 5 rocking NFC technology later this year, in a potential summer launch.

Are you all for waving goodbye to cards and cash, or does NFC excite you as much as a four hour lecture on the inner beauty of man-hole covers?

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Cryptography, Futureology, Innovation, Mobile Telephony, Radio Solutions | Leave a comment

How to self install the ASTRA2connect system.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

The ASTRA2connect system can be easily installed by anybody who has basic competence in DIY skills and is happy working on a ladder if the dish is to be positioned at height.

Firstly it is necessary to decide upon where you wish to site the dish. Once this decision is made it is then necessary to decide where you wish to site the ASTRA2connect modem. It is important to ensure that the cable run required from the dish to this location does not exceed the maximum cable run length guidelines. Once the dish has been mounted, the cable has been laid to the ASTRA2connect modem and the modem has been connected up and switched on it is necessary to point the dish properly at the relevant satellite. Watch the video below to see how this is done.

Once this procedure has been completed you will be online and ready to use your connection to the internet.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Satellite Broadband | Leave a comment

SMBs Love Hosted VoIP

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

Hosted Voice over IP services “will continue to experience dynamic growth over the next few years,” reaching the £3 billion mark by 2014.

Studies are studies, and it’s easy to point the graph up and to the right when you don’t have to close the sale. But there does seem to be a kernel of sense in the idea that very small businesses — Rustyice calls 20- to 50-seat deployments the sweet spot — would turn to an outsourced or hosted VoIP model, rather than looking for in-house expertise, software and infrastructure.

While Rustyice Managing Director Paula Livingstone said late last year that VoIP overall and for small-biz specifically “isn’t yet at that hockey-stick growth phase,” she did say that small businesses are historically underserved, even though they represent a big part of the overall economic pie. And as providers add more functionality, it sounds reasonable that small businesses looking to add functionality to their phones or lower their telephony costs would look first at a hosted VoIP model.

At Rustyice Solutions, we have partnered with the industry leader of hosted VOIP in the UK, InclarityLtd. If you would like to know more about our offering in this area why not take a look at our hosted VOIP brochure by clicking here. If you would like some more information then why not give us a call, free on 0800 012 1090 or use our convenient online contact form which can be found here.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Voice, VOIP | Leave a comment

Maintaining Mission Critical Networks

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

Network maintenance is an inherent component of a network administrator’s responsibilities. However, that network administrator might be performing maintenance tasks in response to a reported problem. This reactive approach is unavoidable, because unforeseen issues do arise. However, the occurrence of these interrupt-driven maintenance tasks can be reduced by pro-actively performing regularly scheduled maintenance tasks.

You could think of regularly scheduled tasks, such as performing backups and software upgrades, as important but not urgent. Spending more time on the important tasks can help reduce time spent on the urgent tasks (for example, responding to user connectivity issues or troubleshooting a network outage).

Network maintenance, at its essence, is doing whatever is required to keep the network functioning and meeting the business needs of the organisation.

Some examples of the types of task that fall under the umbrella of network maintenance are as follows:

  • Hardware and software installation and configuration.
  • Troubleshooting problem reports.
  • Monitoring and tuning network performance.
  • Planning for network expansion.
  • Documenting the network and any changes made to the network.
  • Ensuring compliance with legal regulations  and corporate policies.
  • Securing the network against internal and external threats.

Obviously this listing is only a sampling of network maintenance tasks. Also, keep in mind that the list of tasks required to maintain one network could be quite different from the list of tasks required to maintain another network.

Well-Known Network Maintenance Models

The subtleties of each network should be considered when constructing a structured network maintenance model. However, rather than starting from scratch, you might want to base your maintenance model on one of the well-known maintenance models and make adjustments as appropriate.

The following is a sampling of some of the more well-known maintenance models:

  • FCAPS: FCAPS (which stands for Fault management, Configuration management, Accounting management, Performance management and Security management) is a network maintenance model defined by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
  • ITIL: An IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) defines a collection of best-practice recommendations that work together to meet business goals.
  • TMN: The Telecommunications Management Network (TMN) network management model is the Telecommunications Standardisation Sector’s (ITU-T) variation of the FCAPS model. Specifically, TMN targets the management of telecommunications networks.
LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Critical Infrastructure, Fortify, Incident Management, Larger Enterprise, Manage, Network Management, Operational Efficiency, Problem Management, Resilience, Test | Leave a comment

New Satellite Technology a Possible ‘Game Changer’ for Communications

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

As the interoperability discussion continues, so does the frustration of many who have worked on this issue for decades but haven’t seen their goals realized. So it makes sense to take a look into the future of what could be a bright spot.

Satellite technology has proven itself during major events but its limitations are known. During Hurricane Katrina, satellite technology allowed for some semblance of interoperability when most communications systems were down. A new satellite launched three years ago by Hughes has the ability to be a “game changer,” in the words of some neutral panelists at a recent emergency management summit.

The new satellite, which Hughes calls Spaceway, offers path diversity. It doesn’t just bounce up from an antenna to the satellite and reflect down to a ground hub and connect to the Internet or a data center like the traditional satellite. The Spaceway is a router in the sky that can make multiple connections at once, enabling conference calls and video conferencing.

The Department of Defense tested the satellite’s ability in 2009, creating video teleconferencing between the U.S. Northern Command, the Naval Surface Warfare Center’s Dahlgren Division and the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center in San Diego. The after-action report described it as “relatively quick to set up with the ability to carry on high-definition, clear and stable communications with other locations.” FEMA was scheduled to test it during winter 2011.

With the Spaceway, user groups can be built prior to an event and connect when necessary. Agencies and private-sector entities that don’t work together every day can connect quickly during a crisis when other terrestrial communications are not working.

The Spaceway satellite is more akin to a mesh network than the traditional reflector satellite, which enables it to invoke community groups. Another way of describing it is “any to any” connectivity instead of “one to one” connectivity.

Tony Bardo, assistant vice president of Government Solutions at Hughes, called it a “Plan B” network. “If the ground infrastructure is down and you are unable to put together a user group, your radios and so forth are down and you can still get connected, you can quickly invoke a community of users and managers and decision-makers that have access to this Plan B network.”

During Hurricane Katrina, circuits and Bell South towers were inoperable because they were submerged by the flooding. When the towers fell during 9/11, cables and servers went down under the rubble. “These structures on the ground that support our telecommunications are very much in harm’s way when it comes to natural disasters and attacks,” Bardo said.

With Spaceway, both the satellite and the routing capacity are 22,000 miles above earth and away from harm, unlike ground-based communication infrastructure.

“If you think about that ground hub in the old system, the ground hub is the router,” Bardo said. “The intelligence is taking place on the ground. Spaceway, with its router in the sky, can enable me to communicate with you in another field office and add another party somewhere else, and out of harm’s way. I send up your IP address, and it connects me with you. I want to connect with the data center, so I send up the IP address on the antenna of the data centre and it connects me there.”

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Critical Infrastructure, Data, Failsafe, Fortify, Incident Response, Resilience, Satellite Broadband, Video Conferencing, WAN | Leave a comment

LEO and MEO Satellites

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

Traditional communications satellites orbit at what is known as a geosynchronous (GEO) orbit at a height above the earth of 22,300 miles (36,000 km). The advantage to this very specific location is that it takes 24 hours for the satellite to orbit the earth, which means that the satellite remains at the same location above the earth at all times and appears to remain stationary to an observer on the ground.
This orbit is very convenient in allowing the user on the ground to fix an antenna to a particular location in the sky. This orbit also provides continuous coverage for any location that can see the satellite and allows the operator to focus on coverage for particular countries or population centers. The disadvantage is the distance itself, which is about three times the diameter of the earth or about 10% of the distance to the moon. In contrast, the International Space Station orbits at an altitude of approximately 250 miles (400 km), and the earth’s atmosphere extends out to only about 600 miles (approximately 1000 km).

GEO orbit is extremely high, which makes GEO satellites expensive to launch and impossible to repair in orbit. But most importantly of all, GEO orbit is so far away that it takes light about 1/4 of a second to travel from earth to the satellite and back down to the receiver, adding a noticeable delay to voice communications and interfering with TCP’s round-trip time based algorithms.

If the distance to GEO satellites causes problems, the obvious solution is to move the satellites closer to the ground in LEO (low earth orbit) or MEO (medium earth orbit) orbit. There is no single definition of LEO and MEO orbits, but in general LEO extends from the ground up to about a thousand miles and MEO extends from there up to GEO orbit.
In addition to lower delay, the cost of launching LEO and MEO satellites is generally much less than for GEO satellites. A LEO satellite can potentially be repaired in orbit from the Space Shuttle.

Iridium, Inmarsat and Globalstar satellite phone systems were designed on the premise that a LEO satellite constellation was necessary to meet latency requirements, as was the proposed Teledesic Internet system. The Iridium satellite phone system is in a 450 mile (780 km) low earth orbit. But Iridium also clearly illustrates the disadvantage to this approach.

Because LEO and MEO satellites move in relationship to the ground, multiple satellites are
required to provide continuous coverage so that at least one satellite is in view at all times.

The lower the satellite is to the ground, the more satellites are necessary to cover the earth. The Iridium system is a constellation of 66 satellites. Store-and-forward tracking systems can work with only a few satellites, but for voice or Internet service, the full constellation must be in orbit before the system can be operational since service which is available for a few minutes out of each hour as the satellite goes overhead will not find many customers. In contrast, a GEO satellite can provide coverage to users on about 1/3 of the earth with only a single satellite. So while it may cost less to launch a single LEO satellite, the whole fleet can cost billions of dollars before the system can be switched on and begin generating revenue.

Also, due to the movement of the satellites relative to the users, a sophisticated hand-off system is necessary to periodically move the user from one satellite that is disappearing over the horizon to another satellite that is still visible. On the ground, a sophisticated antenna which can track moving satellites and switch between satellites on-the-fly may be required, which would likely make the customer premise equipment prohibitively expensive for consumers. Satellite telephone systems solved this problem by using a unidirectional antenna which is sufficient for low power phone service (although the subsequent inability of the phone to work indoors or even in the shadow of tall buildings may have been a large contributor to the failure of the businesses) but this type of unidirectional antenna would be unlikely to work for Internet systems operating at high data rates.

Lastly, while LEO satellites do reduce the round-trip time to just a few tens of milliseconds, the round-trip time will be highly variable depending on whether the satellite is directly overhead or on the horizon. Since TCP’s retransmission mechanisms are tied to the round-trip time, TCP can be highly sensitive to variability in the round-trip time.

Summary

Overall, by bringing the satellite much closer to the ground, LEO and MEO satellites are able to resolve most TCP performance limitations by reducing the satellite latency to a value typical of terrestrial networks. However, LEO and MEO satellite networks introduce other technical challenges regarding antenna design, connection hand-over, and satellite-to-satellite communications. Most importantly, the cost of a constellation of LEO satellites is nearly impossible to justify with any rational business plan, especially when GEO satellites can be made to work just as well by using some basic protocol enhancements.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Data, Radio Solutions, Satellite Broadband, Tech Tips, WAN | Leave a comment

VU Telepresence January 2012 promotion (Extended to 10Feb)

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

NOTE – THIS PROMOTION HAS BEEN EXTENDED UNTIL THE 10TH OF FEB.

We are pleased to announce a promotion on the VU Telepresence VU-Pro which is valid until January 20 2012.

Call us free on 08000 121 090

Vu TelePresence Pro – New Year Promotional Pricing

 Product Price Per Unit

Vu TelePresence™ Pro 720p

(Without Display)

£699

Vu TelePresence™ Pro 1080p

(Without Display)

£1299

 

Terms & Conditions

    • The above pricing is Vu TelePresence New Year Promotional pricing valid till January 20, 2012.
    • The offer is valid only if we receive your purchase order by January 20, 2012 and the amount by January 25, 2012. 
LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Promotions, VU Telepresence | Leave a comment

Communications Satellites: Making the Global Village Possible

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

In 500 years, when humankind looks back at the dawn of space travel, Apollo’s landing on the Moon in 1969 may be the only event remembered. At the same time, however, Lyndon B. Johnson, himself an avid promoter of the space program, felt that reconnaissance satellites alone justified every penny spent on space. Weather forecasting has undergone a revolution because of the availability of pictures from geostationary meteorological satellites–pictures we see every day on television. All of these are important aspects of the space age, but satellite communications has probably had more effect than any of the rest on the average person. Satellite communications is also the only truly commercial space technology- -generating billions of pounds annually in sales of products and services.

The Billion Dollar Technology

In the autumn of 1945 an RAF electronics officer and member of the British Interplanetary Society, Arthur C. Clarke, wrote a short article in Wireless World that described the use of manned satellites in 24-hour orbits high above the world’s land masses to distribute television programs. His article apparently had little lasting effect in spite of Clarke’s repeating the story in his 1951/52 The Exploration of Space . Perhaps the first person to carefully evaluate the various technical options in satellite communications and evaluate the financial prospects was John R. Pierce of AT&T’s Bell Telephone Laboratories who, in a 1954 speech and 1955 article, elaborated the utility of a communications “mirror” in space, a medium-orbit “repeater” and a 24-hour-orbit “repeater.” In comparing the communications capacity of a satellite, which he estimated at 1,000 simultaneous telephone calls, and the communications capacity of the first trans-atlantic telephone cable (TAT-1), which could carry 36 simultaneous telephone calls at a cost of 30-50 million pounds, Pierce wondered if a satellite would be worth a billion pounds.

After the 1957 launch of Sputnik I, many considered the benefits, profits, and prestige associated with satellite communications. Because of Congressional fears of “duplication,” NASA confined itself to experiments with “mirrors” or “passive” communications satellites (ECHO), while the Department of Defense was responsible for “repeater” or “active” satellites which amplify the received signal at the satellite–providing much higher quality communications. In 1960 AT&T filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for permission to launch an experimental communications satellite with a view to rapidly implementing an operational system. The U.S. government reacted with surprise– there was no policy in place to help execute the many decisions related to the AT&T proposal. By the middle of 1961, NASA had awarded a competitive contract to RCA to build a medium-orbit (4,000 miles high) active communication satellite (RELAY); AT&T was building its own medium-orbit satellite (TELSTAR) which NASA would launch on a cost-reimbursable basis; and NASA had awarded a sole- source contract to Hughes Aircraft Company to build a 24-hour (20,000 mile high) satellite (SYNCOM). The military program, ADVENT, was cancelled a year later due to complexity of the spacecraft, delay in launcher availability, and cost over-runs.

By 1964, two TELSTARs, two RELAYs, and two SYNCOMs had operated successfully in space. This timing was fortunate because the Communications Satellite Corporation (COMSAT), formed as a result of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962, was in the process of contracting for their first satellite. COMSAT’s initial capitalization of 200 million dollars was considered sufficient to build a system of dozens of medium-orbit satellites. For a variety of reasons, including costs, COMSAT ultimately chose to reject the joint AT&T/RCA offer of a medium-orbit satellite incorporating the best of TELSTAR and RELAY. They chose the 24-hour-orbit (geosynchronous) satellite offered by Hughes Aircraft Company for their first two systems and a TRW geosynchronous satellite for their third system. On April 6, 1965 COMSAT’s first satellite, EARLY BIRD, was launched from Cape Canaveral. Global satellite communications had begun.

The Global Village: International Communications

Some glimpses of the Global Village had already been provided during experiments with TELSTAR, RELAY, and SYNCOM. These had included televising parts of the 1964 Tokyo Olympics. Although COMSAT and the initial launch vehicles and satellites were American, other countries had been involved from the beginning. AT&T had initially negotiated with its European telephone cable “partners” to build earth stations for TELSTAR experimentation. NASA had expanded these negotiations to include RELAY and SYNCOM experimentation. By the time EARLY BIRD was launched, communications earth stations already existed in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Brazil, and Japan. Further negotiations in 1963 and 1964 resulted in a new international organization, which would ultimately assume ownership of the satellites and responsibility for management of the global system. On August 20, 1964, agreements were signed which created the International Telecommunications Satellite Organization (INTELSAT).

By the end of 1965, EARLY BIRD had provided 150 telephone “half- circuits” and 80 hours of television service. The INTELSAT II series was a slightly more capable and longer-lived version of EARLY BIRD. Much of the early use of the COMSAT/INTELSAT system was to provide circuits for the NASA Communications Network (NASCOM). The INTELSAT III series was the first to provide Indian Ocean coverage to complete the global network. This coverage was completed just days before one half billion people watched APOLLO 11 land on the moon on July 20, 1969.

Hello Guam: Domestic Communications

In 1965, ABC proposed a domestic satellite system to distribute television signals. The proposal sank into temporary oblivion, but in 1972 TELESAT CANADA launched the first domestic communications satellite, ANIK, to serve the vast Canadian continental area. RCA promptly leased circuits on the Canadian satellite until they could launch their own satellite. The first U.S. domestic communications satellite was Western Union’s WESTAR I, launched on April 13, 1974. In December of the following year RCA launched their RCA SATCOM F- 1. In early 1976 AT&T and COMSAT launched the first of the COMSTAR series. These satellites were used for voice and data, but very quickly television became a major user. By the end of 1976 there were 120 transponders available over the U.S., each capable of providing 1500 telephone channels or one TV channel. Very quickly the “movie channels” and “super stations” were available to most Americans. The dramatic growth in cable TV would not have been possible without an inexpensive method of distributing video.

The ensuing two decades have seen some changes: Western Union is no more; Hughes is now a satellite operator as well as a manufacturer; AT&T is still a satellite operator, but no longer in partnership with COMSAT; GTE, originally teaming with Hughes in the early 1960s to build and operate a global system is now a major domestic satellite operator. Television still dominates domestic satellite communications, but data has grown tremendously with the advent of very small aperture terminals (VSATs). Small antennas, whether TV-Receive Only (TVRO) or VSAT are a commonplace sight all over the country.

New Technology

The first major geosynchronous satellite project was the Defense Department’s ADVENT communications satellite. It was three-axis stabilized rather than spinning. It had an antenna that directed its radio energy at the earth. It was rather sophisticated and heavy. At 500-1000 pounds it could only be launched by the ATLAS- CENTAUR launch vehicle. ADVENT never flew, primarily because the CENTAUR stage was not fully reliable until 1968, but also because of problems with the satellite. When the program was canceled in 1962 it was seen as the death knell for geosynchronous satellites, three-axis stabilization, the ATLAS-CENTAUR, and complex communications satellites generally. Geosynchronous satellites became a reality in 1963, and became the only choice in 1965. The other ADVENT characteristics also became commonplace in the years to follow.

In the early 1960s, converted intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and intermediate range ballistic missiles (IRBMs) were used as launch vehicles. These all had a common problem: they were designed to deliver an object to the earth’s surface, not to place an object in orbit. Upper stages had to be designed to provide a delta-Vee (velocity change) at apogee to circularize the orbit. The DELTA launch vehicles, which placed all of the early communications satellites in orbit, were THOR IRBMs that used the VANGUARD upper stage to provide this delta-Vee. It was recognized that the DELTA was relatively small and a project to develop CENTAUR, a high-energy upper stage for the ATLAS ICBM, was begun. ATLAS-CENTAUR became reliable in 1968 and the fourth generation of INTELSAT satellites used this launch vehicle. The fifth generation used ATLAS-CENTAUR and a new launch-vehicle, the European ARIANE. Since that time other entries, including the Russian PROTON launch vehicle and the Chinese LONG MARCH have entered the market. All are capable of launching satellites almost thirty times the weight of EARLY BIRD.

In the mid-1970s several satellites were built using three-axis stabilization. They were more complex than the spinners, but they provided more despun surface to mount antennas and they made it possible to deploy very large solar arrays. The greater the mass and power, the greater the advantage of three-axis stabilization appears to be. Perhaps the surest indication of the success of this form of stabilization was the switch of Hughes, closely identified with spinning satellites, to this form of stabilization in the early 1990s. The latest products from the manufacturers of SYNCOM look quite similar to the discredited ADVENT design of the late 1950s.

Much of the technology for communications satellites existed in 1960, but would be improved with time. The basic communications component of the satellite was the traveling-wave-tube (TWT). These had been invented in England by Rudoph Kompfner, but they had been perfected at Bell Labs by Kompfner and J. R. Pierce. All three early satellites used TWTs built by a Bell Labs alumnus. These early tubes had power outputs as low as 1 watt. Higher- power (50-300 watts) TWTs are available today for standard satellite services and for direct-broadcast applications. An even more important improvement was the use of high-gain antennas. Focusing the energy from a 1-watt transmitter on the surface of the earth is equivalent to having a 100-watt transmitter radiating in all directions. Focusing this energy on Western Europe. is like having a 1000-watt transmitter radiating in all directions. The principal effect of this increase in actual and effective power is that earth stations are no longer 100-foot dish reflectors with cryogenically-cooled maser amplifiers costing as much as £20 million to build. Antennas for normal satellite services are typically 15-foot dish reflectors costing £50,000. Our own customer premises antennas in use on our Apogee Internet Satellite Broadband service are 79cm in diameter and extremely low cost and none of this could be possible without the use of high gain antennas.

Mobile Services

In February of 1976 COMSAT launched a new kind of satellite, MARISAT, to provide mobile services to maritime customers. In the early 1980s Europe launched the MARECS series to provide the same services. In 1979 the UN International Maritime Organization sponsored the establishment of the International Maritime Satellite Organization (INMARSAT) in a manner similar to INTELSAT. INMARSAT initially leased the MARISAT and MARECS satellite transponders, but in October of 1990 it launched the first of its own satellites, INMARSAT II F-1. The third generation, INMARSAT III, has already been launched. An aeronautical satellite was proposed in the mid-1970s. A contract was awarded to General Electric to build the satellite, but it was cancelled. INMARSAT now provides this service. Although INMARSAT was initially conceived as a method of providing telephone service and traffic-monitoring services on ships at sea, it has provided much more. The journalist with a briefcase phone has been ubiquitous for some time, but the Gulf War brought this technology to the public eye.

Competition

In 1965, when EARLY BIRD was launched, the satellite provided almost 10 times the capacity of the submarine telephone cables for almost 1/10th the price. This price-differential was maintained until the laying of TAT-8 in the late 1980s. TAT-8 was the first fibre-optic cable laid across the Atlantic. Satellites are still competitive with cable for point-to-point communications, but the future advantage may lie with fiber-optic cable. Satellites still maintain two advantages over cable: they are more reliable and they can be used point-to-multi-point (broadcasting).

Cellular telphone systems have risen as challenges to all other types of telephony. It is possible to place a cellular system in a developing country at a very reasonable price. Long-distance calls require some other technology, but this can be either satellites or fibre-optic cable.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Data, Satellite Broadband, WAN | Leave a comment

Enhancing Oil,Gas and Power Operations – SCADA via Satellite

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

Oil and gas operations are located in unforgiving environments, from the blistering cold of the arctic to the scorching heat of the deserts and the storming conditions out on the open sea. To sustain secure operating conditions in these remote areas, reliable communication is as vital to the end-user as the umbilical cord is to an unborn child.

 

Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition

Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) is a unique aspect of oil, gas and power distribution operations in that it does not entail communication between people, but between machines, also known as machine–machine (M2M).

SCADA describes a computer based system that manages mission critical process applications on the ‘factory floor’. These applications are frequently critical for health, safety and the environment.

The term telemetry is often used in combination with SCADA. Telemetry describes the process of collating data and performing remotely controlled actions via a suitable transmission media. In the context of this article, the telemetry media is a satellite communications solution.

SCADA in Oil, Gas and Power Distribution Operations

SCADA is not limited to a particular aspect of these types of operations. In the Oil and Gas industry, SCADA applications can be found in upstream areas such as well monitoring, downstream in areas such as pipeline operations, in trade by managing the fiscal metering/custody transfer operations and logistics in applications such as inventory management of tank storage facilities. SCADA systems in the Power Distribution industry use RTUs and PLCs to perform the majority of on-site control. The RTU or PLC acquires the site data, which includes meter readings, pressure, voltage, or other equipment status, then performs local control and transfers the data to the central SCADA system. However, when comparing and specifying a solution for challenging SCADA environments, RTU and PLC-based systems are not equal.

PLC Systems are Sub-Optimal for Complex SCADA Systems

Originally designed to replace relay logic, PLCs acquire analog and/or digital data through input modules, and execute a program loop while scanning the inputs and taking actions based on these inputs. PLCs perform well in sequential logic control applications with high discrete I/O data counts, but suffer from overly specialized design, which results in limited CPU performance, inadequate communication flexibility, and lack of easy scalability when it comes to adding future requirements other than I/O.
With the rapid expansion of remote site monitoring and control, three critical industry business trends have recently come into focus:

• System performance and intelligence – Process automation improves efficiency, plant safety, and reduces labor costs. However, complex processes like AGA gas flow calculations and high-resolution event capture in electric utility applications require very high performance and system-level intelligence. The reality is that even high-performance PLCs cannot meet all these expectations.

• Communication flexibility – Redundant communication links between remote systems and the central SCADA application form the basis of a reliable, secure, and safe enterprise. Power routing automation in electric applications, water distribution, warning systems, and oil and gas processes all require unique communication mediums including slow dial-up phone lines, medium speed RF, and broadband wired/wireless IP.

• Configurability and reduced costs – Although process monitoring and control are well defined and understood within many industries, the quest for flexibility and reduced Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) remains challenging. In the past, proprietary PLC units customized with third party components filled the niche, but suffered from lack of configurability and higher maintenance costs than fully integrated units. Today, businesses look for complete modular off-the shelf systems that yield high configurability with a significant improvement in TCO.

At the technical level, several requirements currently influence the SCADA specification process:
• Local intelligence and processing – High processing throughput, 64 bit CPUs with expanded memory for user applications and logging with support for highly complex control routines.

• High-speed communication ports – Monitoring large numbers of events requires systems that support multiple RS232/485 connections running at 230/460 kb/s and multiple Ethernet ports with 10/100 Mb/s capability.

• High-density, fast, and highly accurate I/O modules Hardware that implements 12.5 kHz input counters with 16-bit analog inputs and 14-bit analog outputs for improved accuracy.

• Broadband wireless and wired IP communications. Recent innovations in IP devices demands reliable connectivity to local IEDs (Intelligent Electronic Devices) as well as emerging communication network standards.

• Strict adherence to open standard industry protocols including Modbus, DNP3, and DF-1 on serial and TCP/IP ports

• Robust protocols for support of mixed communication environments.

• Protection of critical infrastructure – Enhanced security such as password-protected programming, over the air encryption, authentication, and IP firewall capability.

Selecting a Satellite Communication Solution – Factors to Consider

Security

When selecting a satellite communications solution, there are numerous factors that must be considered. Enterprise applications like e-mail, Internet access, telephony, videoconferencing, etc. frequently tie into public communications infrastructure. Due to security and reliability considerations it is considered best practice to isolate mission critical SCADA communications infrastructure from public networks.

The Rustyice solution is a dedicated satellite communications network solution tailored for the SCADA applications environment. By virtue of system design, our solution offers greater security against hacker attacks and virus infestation which mainly target computers that are connected to the Internet and are running office applications.

Reliability

Due to the critical nature of most SCADA operations, a reliable communication solution is of utmost importance. The satellite communications industry is mature with a proven track record. Satellite transponder availability is typically in the 99.99 percentile range, a number far superior to that of terrestrial networks. To build on this strength, our solution utilises a miniature satellite hub that is deployed at the end-users SCADA control centre. Data to/from the remote terminal units (RTUs) are piped directly into the SCADA system. There is no vulnerable terrestrial back-haul from a communication service providers facility, which can cause the entire network to crash if cut during public works, i.e. digging.

To increase the reliability of the hub, it is frequently deployed in a redundant/load sharing configuration. This ensures that the hub is available more than 100% of the time, making it far from the weakest link in the communication chain.

Types of Connectivity

Contrary to enterprise-related communications which take place randomly, SCADA communication is quite predictable. It is a continuous process, where the SCADA application polls the RTUs at regular intervals. The outgoing poll request is a short datagram (packet) containing as few as 10 bytes. The returned data from the RTUs are also in a datagram format with the message size being from 10 bytes to 250 bytes. One could easily assume that a satellite solution based upon dial-up connectivity such as Inmarsat, Iridium or Globalstar would be ideal for this application environment. Since SCADA is not just data collection, but also entails control (which at times can be of an emergency nature), you simply cannot wait for the system to encounter a busy connection. What is needed is a system that provides an ‘always on’ type of connection, commonly referred to as leased line connectivity.

A Rustyice solution supports both circuit switched (leased line and multi drop) and packet switched (TCP/IP and X.25) applications concurrently.

Contact us today to speak to one of our representatives and examine how a Rustyice Satellite SCADA solution can offer your operations the best of all worlds.

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Critical Infrastructure, Failsafe, Fortify, Industrial Process Control, Network Management, Operational Efficiency, Power, Satellite Broadband, SCADA, WAN | Leave a comment

Happy New Year 2012

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare

We would like to wish all our readers a very happy and prosperous new year.

 

LinkedInFacebookStumbleUponDeliciousDiggPosterousRedditShare
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment